New RAV4 for 2018 - Page 2 - Escape Trailer Owners Community

Go Back   Escape Trailer Owners Community > Escape Tech > Towing and Hitching
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 10-12-2017, 08:54 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Falun- (Populatuon 82), Wisconsin
Trailer: 2013 - 17 ft Casita Spirit Deluxe.---
Posts: 998
The 2018 rav4 sounds like a good commuter vehicle as well as a good tow vehicle for a Scamp 13 or other small , lightweight trailer .
The Highlander may be more appropriate for an Escape 17A.
__________________

__________________
The Wisconsin Troll
steve dunham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2017, 09:28 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
thoer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Galesville, Wisconsin
Trailer: 2017 21 "Blue II" & 2017 Highlander XLE (previously 2010 17B "Blue" & 2008 Tacoma)
Posts: 3,835
Glenn, planning to trade in your 17B for a Scamp 13 anytime soon?

Accurate tag lines are very appreciated.
__________________

__________________
Eric (and Mary who is in no way responsible for anything stupid I post)

SAE Towing Standard "Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw
thoer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2017, 09:31 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Trailer: 2011 Escape 15A
Posts: 523
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbaglo View Post
I'd also ask where the full-size spare is.
And, magazine article says all new RAV4s have a 2.5 liter four-cylinder engine.
My RAV4 V6 has a 3.5 liter engine.
That's why I'm skeptical that it would be any better than my Forester. But I'd like to see a review. What I'd really like, which has been rumored but not announced, is a 5 passenger, smaller Honda Pilot.
Bobbie54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2017, 02:30 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 8,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbie54 View Post
That's why I'm skeptical that it would be any better than my Forester. But I'd like to see a review. What I'd really like, which has been rumored but not announced, is a 5 passenger, smaller Honda Pilot.
It would be bizarre for Honda to reduce the overall size of the Pilot, for four reasons:
  • The current Pilot is relatively new (first model year 2016) so any major change will be at least a couple more years.
  • The Pilot is the largest Honda-branded SUV, so if they made it smaller they would need an additional model above it.
  • The CR-V is smaller than a Pilot, so a smaller Pilot would squeeze into CR-V territory, which is already sandwiched between the even smaller HR-V and the Pilot.
  • Car models very rarely get smaller; the normal pattern is to make them bigger with every generation, and fill in under them with new models. The CR-V grew, the Pilot grew as well, and eventually the HR-V was introduced at a size similar to the original CR-V; at Toyota, the RAV4 grew and grew and got just as big as the original Highlander, and the Highlander grew as well to stay above the RAV4, and eventually the C-HR was introduced at a size similar to the original RAV4. That's a more normal pattern.
Since this vehicle has become relatively large, it is plausible that Honda will do two lengths at the next update of the Pilot - a 5-passenger short-wheelbase and a 7-passenger long-wheelbase. The short version would be just as tall, just as wide, and almost as heavy, but with less interior space and inferior towing stability. Having two lengths has been relatively common in SUVs; GM currently does this, and other companies have in the past.
Brian B-P is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2017, 10:31 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Trailer: 2011 Escape 15A
Posts: 523
Honda Aims To Squeeze Another SUV Between CR-V And Pilot In 2018

https://www.thetorquereport.com/hond...er-pilot-2018/

Who knows? Automakers do come out with things that don't make a lot of sense, like a 4 cylinder Rav4 with higher towing capacity.
Bobbie54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2017, 10:41 AM   #16
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia
Trailer: looking at 17B Escape
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbaglo View Post
Could be Pilot, or Highlander.
I'm very happy with my Toyota for all the usual reasons, quality, service, resale.
But, I'd look at the Pilot, even if it is huge compared to my RAV4.
4Runner, Tacoma, etc would have to have an escalator optional before my wife would consider it.
Here is the escalator option for your wife. They make these for the Tacoma and I know CAP-IT sells and installs them. Kind of expensive but pretty cool. They drop lower than a standard running board and extend out further, actually making them useful, versus something that just puts dirt on your pants as you try to exit the vehicle.
Quality AMP Research Powerstep & Truck Running Boards | AMP Research
Sean Murry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2017, 11:27 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Chapitre's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Trailer: 2014 5TA/ *012 17B (previous)
Posts: 369
Towed my 17b long distances with a 6cyl RAV 4 it was working pretty hard, we always had to be measuring weight etc., - lots of trips to CAT scales the wheelbase was too short in my opinion but everyone has a certain level of comfort. Others think they're great- I kept it a year then changed to a longer wheel base. I'm surprised a 4cylinder could manage it - maybe the wheelbase is longer. I wouldn't consider it. This is just my opinion and comfort level. The highlander or pilot would be great.
__________________
Min D
Chapi II
--------------------
'Have No Regrets'
Chapitre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2017, 03:33 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 8,831
The second article contains this:
Quote:
The new short-wheelbase Honda Pilot will enter production in fall 2018 at Honda’s Lincoln, Alabama plant. The move will give Honda another model to capitalize on the ever growing demand for crossovers in the U.S. Hyundai already offers two versions of the Santa Fe...
... which is what I was suggesting. To see how this short- and long-wheelbase scheme can work, have a look at the Hyundai Santa Fe Sport (short) and XL (long).

Both articles suggest production starting in a year, and at this close to production there are normally car-spotter photos of pre-production units being tested, so a truly separate model seems unlikely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbie54 View Post
Automakers do come out with things that don't make a lot of sense, like a 4 cylinder Rav4 with higher towing capacity.
I don't know why a 4 cylinder Rav4 with higher towing capacity doesn't make sense. This vehicle - with the 2.5 L 4-cylinder - has about the same engine power as a typical full-sized North American car or pickup truck of the 1970's (such as my parents' Chevy), when no one would have questioned the ability of these vehicles to tow two or three tons of trailer. Even if you don't want to max out a 3500 pound towing capacity (even though that works for some Escape owners with the same chassis), it's certainly suitable for more than the 1500 pounds that it is rated for without the towing package. Even the hybrid is rated for 1750 pounds, so there's clearly room for more than 1500 pounds of trailer with the regular 2.5 L.
Brian B-P is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2017, 05:04 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
thoer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Galesville, Wisconsin
Trailer: 2017 21 "Blue II" & 2017 Highlander XLE (previously 2010 17B "Blue" & 2008 Tacoma)
Posts: 3,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian B-P View Post
...
I don't know why a 4 cylinder Rav4 with higher towing capacity doesn't make sense. This vehicle - with the 2.5 L 4-cylinder - has about the same engine power as a typical full-sized North American car or pickup truck of the 1970's ...when no one would have questioned the ability of these vehicles to tow two or three tons of trailer.
Thank you Brian. I have been thinking of posting something similar for a long time... and then I forget. Comes with being old enough to well remember those vehicles and the days when folks just knew you would be slowing down climbing mountain passes - so we just enjoyed the scenery on the way up. My almost 300HP Highlander, pulling my 21, can climb mountain passes far more easily than my VW Beetle, my Volvo 122s or my Ford Econoline unloaded ever could.
__________________
Eric (and Mary who is in no way responsible for anything stupid I post)

SAE Towing Standard "Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw
thoer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2017, 06:24 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Trailer: 2011 Escape 15A
Posts: 523
I actually do just fine pulling my 15A with a 4 cylinder Subaru Forester (manual) but that 200 lb tongue weight limitation is annoying. So I'm not writing off the Rav 4 Adventure- just want to make sure it really can do the job. Someone will test one for towing soon enough.
__________________

Bobbie54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off






» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.