New Subaru SUV- 7 passenger- - Page 2 - Escape Trailer Owners Community

Go Back   Escape Trailer Owners Community > Escape Tech > Towing and Hitching
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-29-2017, 02:39 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 9,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losangeles View Post
... my gut hunch is that a turbo engine would not provide tons more torque, especially when you need it (merging into a busy CA freeway towing a 21' Escape)
Turbocharged gasoline engines got a bad reputation decades ago, as only suitable for sports cars, making power only at high engine speeds. Modern technology (primarily direct injection, but also variable geometry turbochargers) have radically changed that; the power band of a modern turbo engine is broader than a non-turbo.

The power and torque characteristics of modern turbodiesel engines - which most people seem to find desirable - are due to the turbocharger, not the diesel fuel or diesel cycle.

One turbo problem has always been speed of response, and that has greatly improved. It can still be a bit of an issue. I had a short test drive of Honda CR-V (which has a turbocharged engine and CVT transmission), and found lag from a standstill to be annoying... but some of that could have been the transmission. The Ascent has a CVT, as well. This would certainly be something to look for in a test drive of any turbocharged vehicle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbie54 View Post
Quote:
The all-new Direct-Injection Turbocharged SUBARU BOXERŽ engine delivers 260 hp and 277 lb.-ft. of torque. And with 19.3 gallons of fuel capacity, it puts almost any destination within reach.
I don't know how that compares to a Highlander or Pilot.
This puts the Ascent's peak torque higher than the Pilot (253 lb-ft) and Highlander (267 lb-ft), and although in this quote Subaru does not mention the corresponding engine speed, it will certainly maintain at least most of this peak torque to a much lower speed than the non-turbos (which peak at 4800 and 4700 rpm).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbie54 View Post
My 2012 Forester is 170/174, turbo in the same year was 220/224.
The 2012 Subaru Forester engines are not directly comparable: the non-turbo was a 2.4 L of the current generation (FB), while the turbo was a 2.0 L of the previous generation (FA).
__________________

Brian B-P is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 02:40 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 9,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losangeles View Post
... looking seriously at Audi Q7. My better 1/2 insists on midsize SUV and given our lifestyle, i can't argue.
Another reasonable option. VW has dropped their equivalent to the Q7 (the Touareg), in favour of the Atlas. The Atlas is built on a different platform, and has lower rated towing capacity but longer wheelbase.

The Q7 is shorter in wheelbase than the Ascent, but has had (and presumably still has) a higher tow rating.
__________________

Brian B-P is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2017, 03:03 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Trailer: 2011 Escape 15A
Posts: 543
The 7 (or 8) passenger thing is annoying. I wish the back seats were an option. I want a bench middle seat so am stuck with 8 passengers with any of these. Still hoping Honda comes out with a slightly smaller, 5 passenger Pilot, but not sure how long I want to wait. I want to do Alaska and X-country and would like to get a different tow vehicle first.

I have yet to see any reports on the actual towing capability of the new Rav4 Adventure (the one rated at 3500 lbs.)
Bobbie54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 12:05 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Trailer: none
Posts: 1
Longer wheelbase is good, but the most limiting factor, payload capacity, remains to be seen. A lot of the unibody SUV / crossovers tend to have payloads in the 900-1000 lb range. A 5000 lb tow rating doesn't mean much if after accounting for tongue and hitch weight (probably requires weight distribution for trailers over 3500 lbs) you only have room for two adults and no other cargo.

Then again I get the feeling that most folks on this forum are empty nesters just travelling as a couple, so maybe that's fine. But then why buy a 7-passenger SUV?

So hopefully the frame and suspension are good enough for 1200+ lbs of payload, but at this point who knows.
Rumline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 01:17 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 9,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumline View Post
Then again I get the feeling that most folks on this forum are empty nesters just travelling as a couple, so maybe that's fine. But then why buy a 7-passenger SUV?
Because that's the size of vehicle which has the desired cargo and towing capacity. The same happens with vans: some buy them for passenger capacity, but not everyone. Just because it comes with seats does not mean that those seats need to be occupied. Many people remove the surplus seats from their vans, even the ones which are not intended to be removable.

So why not just buy a van? For one thing, all-wheel-drive is not highly available in vans, although the Toyota Sienna is still available with it.
Brian B-P is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 08:10 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Saluda, North Carolina
Trailer: Casita Spirit Deluxe 2004 ( 2018 Escape 21 on the way! )
Posts: 112
It has a CVT transmission (we have a Forester), which isn't conducive to towing. I love Subaru's, but wouldn't tow anything with a CVT.

https://www.caranddriver.com/subaru/ascent
thiggins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 10:44 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Notasulga, Alabama
Trailer: 2010 EggCamper (#083); 2017 Escape 21 (#053); 2016 F-150 5.0L 4x4
Posts: 1,138
It seems that, for whatever reason, every major vehicle manufacturer in the world believes that every potential full-sized SUV customer in the world wants three-row seating. Try to find a new model full-sized SUV with just two-row seating. Go figure.....
War Eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 11:04 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
rotateclockwise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Durham, North Carolina
Trailer: 1721
Posts: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Eagle View Post
It seems that, for whatever reason, every major vehicle manufacturer in the world believes that every potential full-sized SUV customer in the world wants three-row seating. Try to find a new model full-sized SUV with just two-row seating. Go figure.....
Totally agree with you.
rotateclockwise is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 11:27 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Notasulga, Alabama
Trailer: 2010 EggCamper (#083); 2017 Escape 21 (#053); 2016 F-150 5.0L 4x4
Posts: 1,138
Our first SUV (recall that the middle letter stands for "utility") was a 1988 Toyota 4Runner (body-on-frame design, removable rear cap). At the time, the State of Alabama didn't even have an SUV designation on their vehicle registration forms yet. My understanding was that what warranted the "utility" designation was that it had ample enclosed cargo space and ample towing capacity. Many of today's so-called SUV's have limited enclosed cargo space (sacrificed for third-row seating and other luxuries) and limited towing capacity (sacrificed for fuel efficiency) and are in reality not much more than family station wagons being marketed under the snazzier "SUV" banner. Just my opinion, I'll get off my soapbox...
War Eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2017, 01:29 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Burlington Twp., New Jersey
Trailer: 2010 Escape 19
Posts: 1,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Eagle View Post
Many of today's so-called SUV's have limited enclosed cargo space (sacrificed for third-row seating and other luxuries) and limited towing capacity (sacrificed for fuel efficiency) and are in reality not much more than family station wagons being marketed under the snazzier "SUV" banner.
That's why we hear things like "crossover" and "CUV" more now. It's a lot of marketing mumbo jumbo, but also design compromises.
This is pretty interesting from Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossover_(automobile)

To my knowledge the only mid-size SUV's that are still body-on-frame are the Toyota 4Runner and it's cousin the Lexus GX.
__________________

rubicon327 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off






» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.