RAM 3500 - Too Harsh for an Escape 19 or 21? - Escape Trailer Owners Community

Go Back   Escape Trailer Owners Community > Escape Tech > Towing and Hitching
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-25-2016, 09:21 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Fulltime RV - USA Wide!, South Dakota
Trailer: 2013 Montana 5th wheel & Ram Pick-up
Posts: 18
RAM 3500 - Too Harsh for an Escape 19 or 21?

I have a 2011 RAM 3500 4x2 truck that I use to pull our full-time 40' Montana from long-term-destination to long-term-destination. Needless to day, this monster combinaton is not conducive to spontaneous side trips. I pine for something smaller. An Escape 19 or 21 would perfectly fit the bill.

My question is, would a 3500 truck beat an Escape to death? Mine does ride quite smooth for a truck of this capacity but it's nowhere near as smooth as a 150/1500 series truck.

Thoughts?
__________________

Kevin H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2016, 09:51 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
rbryan4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Trailer: 2015 19 "Past Tents", 2015 F150 Ecoboost
Posts: 5,784
I don't think it would beat it to death, because the trailer suspension isn't dependent on the truck. But, the relatively low tongue weight of a 19 or a 21 and the stiffness of the truck's rear end might mean a little harsher ride for the trailer.

I wouldn't be as concerned about the trailer ride as I would the efficiency. A 3500 is way overkill for a lightweight trailer, and would waste fuel. Then you have to consider the side trips at a campground with a larger vehicle.

I've seen lots of small rigs being towed by overlarge trucks. It works of course, but it's a mismatch.
__________________

__________________
"You can't buy happiness, but you can buy an RV. And that is pretty close."
rbryan4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2016, 10:01 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
padlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southwick, Massachusetts
Trailer: 5.0 TA #6, 2012 F150 EB
Posts: 2,914
If I remember right, the first of the 5.0TA's was setup for an F350. Heck, you already have the hitch on the truck.
__________________
Happy Motoring
Bob
padlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 12:27 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 7,782
Is it a dually, or are you lucky enough to at least have a single-rear-wheel 3500?

The tongue end of the trailer will get a rough ride, compared to what it would get with a softer truck, but it's probably no worse than the trailer's own suspension. Reasonably matching the trailer suspension and the suspension holding up the tongue is probably better for stability, anyway.

You can smooth out the truck's suspension by ditching all of the overload leaves and replacing them with airbags, so the springing can be matched to the load (which is relatively light when towing an Escape, unless you're carrying a lot of cargo at the same time.

Another factor in ride harshness is tire pressure (on the truck). They need enough pressure to safely carry the load, but much more than that just causes excessive stiffness and harshness. As with most trucks there is a choice of tires, but if (for example) you have SRW with LT245/70R17 tires they might be Load Range E, with a maximum inflation pressure of 80 psi... but you don't need that much air if you're not carrying 6,000 pounds on the rear axle.
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 01:04 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Fulltime RV - USA Wide!, South Dakota
Trailer: 2013 Montana 5th wheel & Ram Pick-up
Posts: 18
Good info folks. Thanks. Here are the specs on my truck:
2011 Ram 3500
4x2 (if I need 4x4 I'm too far north!)
SRW (single rear wheel, not a dually)
Full Crew cab (four doors)
8' box - this thing is long
Cummins 6.7 diesel
Six speed manual trans
373 gears in rear end
Air bags on rear
Weight with half tank and two passengers: 7700#
Probably more info than necessary but...

As to efficiency - This is an extremely efficient truck for what it is. When I pull my 14k+ trailer, I average 11 mpg. Not pulling, around 18mpg. Yes, for a small trailer like the Escape, there are more efficient trucks, but this is what I have and I need it for my big trailer that I am not going to get rid of, plus, I am not in a position to plunk down another $30k for a new truck. Efficiency is a big concern for me but I have to live with what I have right now.

I considered a 5.0TA but I want the storage of the truck bed when, and if, I get the Escape. So a cap may be in the mix as well. You are correct tho, I do already have a 5th wheel hitch so that would be a plus.

I do air down the tires when not hauling heavy. The Michelin inflation chart says I can go as low as 35 pounds based on my weighed numbers. I drop it to 50 in the front because that engine is so heavy, and 40 in the back. I tried 35 but it was a little too spongy for my taste. Thanks for bringing that up tho. That is one of the main reasons I am overall pretty comfortable with the ride, again given that it is a 3500.

I see what was said about the truck hitch ride being similar to the suspension on the Escape. Had not thought of that. Has anyone ever changed the suspension to something a bit smoother with disc brakes and shocks? I ask, because I just did that on the behemeth and the ride was dramatically improved.

Anyway, thanks for the input. It appears that my truck would work. Worst comes to worst I could put some weight in the bed, but then the discussion of efficiency pops up again. And round and round we go.

Great forum - terrific info and support. At this time, just daydreaming but like I said, I pine for something smaller to meander about with.
Kevin H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 07:28 AM   #6
Site Team
 
cpaharley2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: York, Pennsylvania
Trailer: 2016 2ndGen Escape 19' PRAIRIE SCHOONER pulled by 2014 Ram Hemi/8sp
Posts: 10,956
How will you move both units when you chase the sun for warmth?
__________________
Jim
never in doubt, often wrong
cpaharley2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 08:13 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Jim Bennett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Trailer: 2017 Escape 5.0 TA
Posts: 9,705
I towed my 19 a few times with my F-350. It too is a Crew Cab, has with an 8' box. You can't get a much bigger pickup. It has a 6.7 litre PowerStroke engine.

I much preferred driving the Honda Pilot I had for towing it, especially when needing to do a lot of driving around without the trailer in tow. A much better run around vehicle for driving and fuel economy.

Where the F-350 shone was pulling through the mountains and with a headwind, as it got at least as good of fuel economy while towing as the Pilot, had tons of power to spare, plus made it almost three times the distance while towing.

If mostly towing on leveller terrain, and going for longer trips, I would much prefer the comfort and generally drivability of the Pilot. There were very few inclines it struggled on, and 95% of the time had great performance.

I know many here promote "The bigger the better" for a tow vehicle. For the most part my preference is something that is very adequate. Much of it though also depends on what all you use your tow vehicle for, is it just towing where something with more power is not to bad, or will you use it for lots other than towing where the larger vehicle is a waste of cost and fuel?

If I was buying a new vehicle for towing a 19 or 21, I would be looking for a mid-sized SUV with adequate towing capacities. In your case with the Dodge 3500, I would likely be inclined to give it a go, and then decide once you need to upgrade.
__________________
2017 Escape 5.0 TA (January 27)
2015 Ford F150 Lariat 3.5L EcoBoost
2009 Escape 19 (previous)
“Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.” — Abraham Lincoln
Jim Bennett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 08:37 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Signal Mountain (Chattanooga), Tennessee
Trailer: Escape 21 November 2014; 2016 Ram Eco-diesel 4WD Crew
Posts: 210
I agree with the "give it a go" response.
I looked up your truck's length, and Ram says it's 21'7".
That sounds like a perfect match for an Escape 21'

Moving down from your big trailer, I'd also recommend the Escape 21. It's not only longer, but also wider than the 19'.

As far as efficiency, I'd bet your truck would get 16 mpg towing, if it already gets 18 not towing. That's about as good as it gets.
Bill
Bill and Earline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 10:28 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
rbryan4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Trailer: 2015 19 "Past Tents", 2015 F150 Ecoboost
Posts: 5,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill and Earline View Post
As far as efficiency, I'd bet your truck would get 16 mpg towing, if it already gets 18 not towing. That's about as good as it gets.
Bill
18 is exceptional, although owners of the same truck report an average of 12.9 mpg when not towing.

Still, I've seen much worse on a larger truck.
__________________
"You can't buy happiness, but you can buy an RV. And that is pretty close."
rbryan4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2016, 02:48 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 7,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbryan4 View Post
18 is exceptional, although owners of the same truck report an average of 12.9 mpg when not towing.

Still, I've seen much worse on a larger truck.
There are at least four difficulties with reporting of fuel consumption of larger trucks:
  • Government regulations do not require the testing or reporting of fuel consumption, as they do for light vehicles, so all reported numbers are individual experience which may not have any relevance for anyone else's situation.
  • Favourable fuel consumption for these trucks is often quoted for constant-speed highway conditions, which is the ideal case, because owners buying these vehicles with a concern about fuel economy are usually buying them for this type of use.
  • Reporting is very selective, with numbers often provided as a defense against accusations of excessive consumption, or as justification for the substantial price premium and higher operating costs of the diesel engine.
  • As with any vehicle, the occasional number in miles per Imperial gallon is thrown in among miles per US gallon values, reinforcing a myth of high fuel economy.
I know a guy with a 2013 GM Duramax 2500, selected to get a diesel for fuel economy; it consumes more fuel than the same body size of decade-older gasoline GM 1500 which it replaced, driven the same way. His response to high fuel economy numbers reported for big diesel pickups is unprintable in this forum. He should have waited for the 2016 Colorado/Canyon, and bought one of those... with the gas engine.

Kevin knows his truck, and knows what to expect for fuel consumption the way he will drive it. If that's workable for a lighter trailer - especially as an interim solution - then it seems reasonable to me to use the truck.
__________________

Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off






» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.