Tow Vehicle Tradeoffs - Escape Trailer Owners Community

Go Back   Escape Trailer Owners Community > Escape Tech > Towing and Hitching
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-07-2014, 12:57 AM   #1
Member
 
Dave Whiting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Kamloops, British Columbia
Trailer: 2015 Escape 19
Posts: 89
Tow Vehicle Tradeoffs

We need a new tow vehicle for an Escape 19 that we are planning to order. Escape Industries advise us that we need a vehicle with a towing capacity of 4500 lbs.

The Jeep Grand Cherokee has a capacity of 6200 lbs. With the factory towing package it comes with a beefed up alternator, cooling system, rear load levelling suspension as well as the Class 4 hitch. It is a very capable towing vehicle.

The competition is a group of highly rated SUVs with a towing capacity of 5000 lbs. A hitch is added by the dealer or third party. This group includes the new Toyota Highlander, the Hyundai Santa Fe XL and others. Although not as capable for towing, these vehicles are cheaper and more reliable.

I want to be assured that I will be driving a safe combination. In the past with our current setup (2005 Highlander and 13 ft Trillium) I have been taken by surprise by long, very steep hills in Utah and Nevada. These are the sorts of areas we like to explore. I want to be confidant I can handle any situation on a paved highway.

I am prepared to compromise on vehicle reliability and price if it means a safer combination. But is the Jeep Grand Cherokee overkill?
__________________

Dave Whiting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 01:28 AM   #2
Commercial Member
 
tractors1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Trailer: 2014 Escape 21 - "Felicity"
Posts: 2,326
I'd go with the Highlander. Had both GCs and Toyotas; 19 ft is 2500 lbs dry weight, so you're well within a tow spec of 5000 even with 500-700 pounds of stuff and liquids.

Charlie Y
__________________

__________________
Charlie Y

Need custom storage to your design? Don't drill holes!
www.RVWidgetWorks.com
tractors1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 02:41 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Central PA, Pennsylvania
Trailer: looking
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by tractors1 View Post
I'd go with the Highlander. Had both GCs and Toyotas; 19 ft is 2500 lbs dry weight, so you're well within a tow spec of 5000 even with 500-700 pounds of stuff and liquids.

Charlie Y
So we could tow a 19ft with our 2013 Sahara Wrangler Unlimited (3500 # tow rating) ? I've been looking at the 17 thinking the 19 would be too much for the Jeep. Thank you in advance for your reply.
BigLew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 07:57 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 9,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigLew View Post
So we could tow a 19ft with our 2013 Sahara Wrangler Unlimited (3500 # tow rating) ? I've been looking at the 17 thinking the 19 would be too much for the Jeep.
This is similar to my situation, with a van rated at 3500 pounds and a current trailer which is the length of an Escape 17' and the width of an Escape 19', weighing 3000 pounds as we have it loaded; I have considered a 19' but the combination is marginal.

I would want to carefully examine all of the limits for this rig, not just the basic trailer weight rating.
  • GCWR [Gross Combination Weight Rating] - total of tug, trailer, load in trailer, load in tug: will you exceed this with the 19' if you have all of your passengers and cargo in the Jeep?
  • GVWR [Gross Vehicle Weight Rating] - total of tug with load in tug including tongue weight of trailer: will you exceed this with all of your passengers and cargo in the Jeep due to the trailer tongue weight?
  • GAWR [Gross Axle Weight Rating] - total carried by each axle tug with load in tug including tongue weight of trailer: will you exceed the limit for the rear axle with all of your passengers and cargo in the Jeep and the trailer tongue weight both adding to it and transferring load from the front to the rear?

The Wrangler might be as capable as the Grand Cherokee in all measures other than the GCWR, since the big advantage of the Grand Cherokee will be primarily in the drivetrain (engine and transmission).
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 07:59 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 9,055
I realize that most people equate a high towing limit with safety, but the manufacturer's rated limit is mostly about capacity for the engine and transmission to operate reliably. Offhand, don't know of any reason to expect a Jeep Grand Cherokee to provide any better trailer control - and thus better safety - than other similarly sized vehicles.
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 08:28 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
padlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southwick, Massachusetts
Trailer: 5.0 TA #6, 2012 F150 EB
Posts: 3,846
Hi Dave, there is a table over on the Fiberglass Forum that lists actual weights Trailer Weights in the Real World - Fiberglass RV. It has the 19 as a max total weight of about 3700 with a hitch weight of 450, depending on options and such.
I have no experience with the 19 but do feel you need a decent combo of weight capabilities as Brian points out, as well as enough HP to make it over those passes and braking to stop it on the down side. You also need sufficient cooling for the tranny, which can be an after market add on.
I'm on my 3rd tow vehicle, keep getting bigger, I'm more comfortable on the overkill side.
__________________
Happy Motoring
Bob
padlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 09:05 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ?, Arizona
Trailer: ?
Posts: 736
Just to add more variable, tow vehicle weight, design and wheelbase matter. Assuming decent engineering and comparable suspension:

The longer the tow vehicle wheelbase the more stable it is.
The heavier the tow vehicle the more the more stable it is.
The shorter the tow vehicle distance from rear axle to rear bumper the more stable it is.
jamman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 09:45 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
azjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ, Arizona
Trailer: gone, 19 and 21
Posts: 472
Tow vehicles for 19 or 21

I agree completely about overkill for a tow vehicle. Years ago when much younger and less experience I was able to ruin at least one pair of pants towing. When we ordered our 19 I moved from a Ridgeline to a 2011 Jeep GC. I looked at the large diesel SUVs but they were very pricey and someone recommended the GC at less money and the V8 had almost the performance of the diesels. When we moved up to the 21 after three years of towing the 19, I didn't have to buy another tow vehicle. My GC was designed when MB controlled jeep/chrysler so the under carriage is close to a MB SUV suspension and the engine is the Dodge Hemi V8 with variable cam timing, two plugs per cylinder, 4 cylinders shut down when not needed and the trans is a CV unit from MB. Fiat gets credit now for fit and finish as they own jeep. My experience with the GC is that it is a very dependable vehicle with outstanding numbers for gas mileage, all weight limit numbers and performance in the mountains. We are in Colorado now and will be going over some of the higher passes that we have towed over before. Check the numbers, ours is the 2 wd as we don't do snow anymore.
Jack with 62000 mile GC just returned from Texas, heading to Moab, BC and Oregon.
azjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 10:25 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 9,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by azjack View Post
When we ordered our 19 I moved from a Ridgeline to a 2011 Jeep GC...
My GC was designed when MB controlled jeep/chrysler so the under carriage is close to a MB SUV suspension and the engine is the Dodge Hemi V8 with variable cam timing, two plugs per cylinder, 4 cylinders shut down when not needed and the trans is a CV unit from MB.
Does "CV" in this case mean "continuously variable"? If so, that's surprising to me, since I've never heard of a Mercedes CVT, a Chrysler CVT (other than the 2mode hybrid), or a CVT in a heavy-duty or V8 application... let alone a Mercedes-sourced CVT in a V8 Chrysler. I learned today that there are some Jatco CVTs in some of their small SUVs, but that's not the Grand Cherokee.

2011 is the current generation of Grand Cherokee; I believe that the 2011 Hemi has a Chrysler (not Mercedes) 545RFE 5-speed conventional automatic. This is probably a fine transmission - it's just not a CVT or a Mercedes. Chrysler apparently likes to call this a "multi-speed" transmission, apparently not noticing that automatics after the old two-speeds of the six decades ago are all multi-speed. :
Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2014, 10:25 AM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Boise, Idaho
Trailer: 2014 17B
Posts: 49
Dave, You should add a 4runner to your list. We just picked up a 17B and drove back to Boise going over numerable passes and steep grades and we easily able to do the speed limit and over the speed limit if we wanted. The 2014 4runner also has electronic trailer sway control and a built in hitch with a 5000lbs tow capacity. A full frame SUV is going to be more stable.
__________________

smilycook is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off






» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.