|
|
11-06-2013, 03:01 PM
|
#21
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Trailer: 2013 Escape 19
Posts: 365
|
But Nikon is better than Canon!
__________________
John and Brenda
Cottage Grove, MN
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 03:38 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Des Plaines, Illinois
Trailer: 2014 Escape 19 (TV: 2007 Chevy Tahoe)
Posts: 208
|
Yes, a "polarized" filter. It takes out glare off of glaring surfaces allowing the camera to see true colors. I suffer the weight of DSLR equipment just because it allows me to use this filter. It's amazing to see how much it impoves a photograph. Because the filter is adjustable/turns you can add as much polarizing as you like...yes, it's possible to add too much.
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 05:05 PM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Trailer: 2017 Escape 5.0 TA
Posts: 15,532
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jrn56
But Nikon is better than Canon!
|
They are both good, it all depends on what the flavour of the day is. What it really comes down to is how good the person operating them is.
One of my favourite What The Duck strips.
__________________
2017 Escape 5.0 TA
2015 Ford F150 Lariat 3.5L EcoBoost
2009 Escape 19 (previous)
“Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.” — Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 05:22 PM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia
Trailer: 2009 Escape 17B 2020 Toyota Highlander XLE
Posts: 17,136
|
Canon and Nikon play leap frog. One is better and then the other. One shouldn't forget the others in the business.
Photogs in the news biz used to put gaffer tape over the logo on their cameras so they wouldn't have to get into conversations about which camera is better.
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 05:40 PM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Galesville, Wisconsin
Trailer: 2017 21 "Blue II" & 2017 Highlander XLE (previously 2010 17B "Blue" & 2008 Tacoma)
Posts: 4,232
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbaglo
Photogs in the news biz used to put gaffer tape over the logo on their cameras so they wouldn't have to get into conversations about which camera is better.
|
That's hilarious... Its kind of like car company arguments...
i really enjoy reading this site about taking better pictures http://www.kenrockwell.com/index.htm
__________________
Eric (and Mary who is in no way responsible for anything stupid I post)
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 06:40 PM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Carlsbad, California, California
Trailer: 2003 Scamp 16' SOLD , 2008 Airstream 19'
Posts: 107
|
I purchased a Canon SX50 about 3 months ago. The thing is so much fun! Having a crazy long telephoto on the camera at all times makes it really handy for nature shots. A bird at 100 yards is no problem. Macro shots of insects is also easy and they fill the frame. Fun to shoot the sun and moon when they won't fit into the frame. The image stabilization really works for hand held shots. The drawback to all this convenience is that the lens is not very fast. I bought a polarizing filter not knowing that it would use a stop of light. I have not used it yet, but have doubts about the practicality of the combo. The filter cost $120.00 too, so may have been an expensive mistake. Love the camera.
Russ
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 06:49 PM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oswego, New York
Trailer: 2017 Escape 21C, 2018 Ford F150
Posts: 5,363
|
The filter will be nice under low light to make "silky" photos of moving water. Set the camera on aperture priority, choose a small stop (large # such as f: 16 or 22) and, using the filter and a tripod, you can take 2-3 second exposures. Good for moving water. A Neutral Density filter will also work.
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 06:55 PM
|
#28
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Galesville, Wisconsin
Trailer: 2017 21 "Blue II" & 2017 Highlander XLE (previously 2010 17B "Blue" & 2008 Tacoma)
Posts: 4,232
|
Russ - I would have bought the SX50 on features and reviews if it only had GPS. (typing is no fun right now as I had trigger finger surgery today and my typing hand looks like this)
__________________
Eric (and Mary who is in no way responsible for anything stupid I post)
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 07:07 PM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia
Trailer: 2009 Escape 17B 2020 Toyota Highlander XLE
Posts: 17,136
|
One of the managers at the newspaper I worked at bought a dozen Nikon GPS accessory units for our cameras because he wanted to add geotags on the paper's web site.
It was pointed out to him that we shoot pix at sensitive places from time to time ( like women's shelters, for instance ), and also that having this piece of stuff hanging off the camera strap wasn't particularly helpful.
Last I saw, he had a whole box of them in his office. Maybe he would sell you one?
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 07:14 PM
|
#30
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Des Plaines, Illinois
Trailer: 2014 Escape 19 (TV: 2007 Chevy Tahoe)
Posts: 208
|
I like to capture motion. I bought a set of neutral density filters to extend exposures. Then something odd happened to some of the photographs. For the really long exposures the colors shifted. The pictures looked like they were taken in late fall instead of mid-May. Some even looked like they were taken using infrared film? Anyone know what's up with that?
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 07:27 PM
|
#31
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Galesville, Wisconsin
Trailer: 2017 21 "Blue II" & 2017 Highlander XLE (previously 2010 17B "Blue" & 2008 Tacoma)
Posts: 4,232
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vermilye
The filter will be nice under low light to make "silky" photos of moving water. Set the camera on aperture priority, choose a small stop (large # such as f: 16 or 22) and, using the filter and a tripod, you can take 2-3 second exposures. Good for moving water. A Neutral Density filter will also work.
|
Nice shot Jon
__________________
Eric (and Mary who is in no way responsible for anything stupid I post)
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 08:34 PM
|
#32
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fraser Valley, British Columbia
Trailer: 2012 Escape "Classic" 5.0 SA
Posts: 554
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkgman51
I like to capture motion. I bought a set of neutral density filters to extend exposures. Then something odd happened to some of the photographs. For the really long exposures the colors shifted. The pictures looked like they were taken in late fall instead of mid-May. Some even looked like they were taken using infrared film? Anyone know what's up with that?
|
Cheap neutral density filters will cause a colour shift especially the 10 stop vari-density ones.
Barry
__________________
Photography website: https://bjustice.zenfolio.com
2012 Escape "Classic" 5.0 SA / 2017 F150, 2.7 EcoBoost 4X4 Supercab
Former trailers: 2005 Escape 17B / 1972 Boler 13'
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 09:17 PM
|
#33
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbaglo
I recently bought an Olympus OM D E-M5 ( no, I don't know why it has so many letters ). It's a mirrorless SLR...
|
A Single Lens Reflex (SLR) camera needs a mirror, to direct the image to the focusing screen (and subsequently viewfinder) through that same single lens as is used to take the photo (and typically a pentaprism to present the horizontal and inverted image to the user). Without a mirror, it can only have an electronic viewfinder or a screen on the back. This Olympus apparently has an 800x600 resolution electronic viewfinder. You might notice that the linked article refers to mirrorless cameras and SLRs as different types.
The other mirrorless cameras with interchangeable lenses discussed in the article are more common that this Olympus, and are commonly called Compact System Cameras - they are a system of body and lenses, and compact because they have no optical viewfinder/mirror system (and usually smaller sensors than typical DSLRs). Most don't have the electronic viewfinder.
Compact system camera lenses usually don't have the very wide zoom ratio of the non-interchangeable superzoom cameras, because you change lenses instead. By interchanging lenses you can choose the optimal lens for the shot, but you're juggling hardware instead of the superzoom one-box convenience.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbaglo
Photogs in the news biz used to put gaffer tape over the logo on their cameras so they wouldn't have to get into conversations about which camera is better.
|
Hilarious. I guess they didn't use those branded neck straps, either. But I'm sure they recognized the brand anyway.
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 09:22 PM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Bennett
One of my favourite What The Duck strips.
|
Excellent! I'm showing that one to my wife, the photographer of the family.
A direct link: WTD 95
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 10:38 PM
|
#35
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fraser Valley, British Columbia
Trailer: 2012 Escape "Classic" 5.0 SA
Posts: 554
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian B-P
A Single Lens Reflex (SLR) camera needs a mirror, to direct the image to the focusing screen (and subsequently viewfinder) through that same single lens as is used to take the photo (and typically a pentaprism to present the horizontal and inverted image to the user). Without a mirror, it can only have an electronic viewfinder or a screen on the back. This Olympus apparently has an 800x600 resolution electronic viewfinder. You might notice that the linked article refers to mirrorless cameras and SLRs as different types.
|
A Reflex camera is a camera that permits the photographer to view the image that will be seen through the lens, and therefore to see exactly what will be captured, contrary to viewfinder cameras where the image could be significantly different from what will be captured. A single-lens reflex camera typically uses a mirror and prism system (hence "reflex", from the mirror's reflection) to accomplish this. The Mirrorless interchangeable-lens camera achieves the same result by providing the photographer with a digitally captured image.
Barry
__________________
Photography website: https://bjustice.zenfolio.com
2012 Escape "Classic" 5.0 SA / 2017 F150, 2.7 EcoBoost 4X4 Supercab
Former trailers: 2005 Escape 17B / 1972 Boler 13'
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 11:02 PM
|
#36
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia
Trailer: 2009 Escape 17B 2020 Toyota Highlander XLE
Posts: 17,136
|
From reviews, I gather the Olympus OM D has the best electronic viewfinder, but it still doesn't compare to the Nikon D4s optical finder I had while working.
I'm finding it particularly difficult to tell if I'm in focus when I'm using the 300mm OM lens and adapter.
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
|
|
|
11-06-2013, 11:34 PM
|
#37
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Fraser Valley, British Columbia
Trailer: 2012 Escape "Classic" 5.0 SA
Posts: 554
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbaglo
From reviews, I gather the Olympus OM D has the best electronic viewfinder, but it still doesn't compare to the Nikon D4s optical finder I had while working.
I'm finding it particularly difficult to tell if I'm in focus when I'm using the 300mm OM lens and adapter.
|
Glenn
You can set the camera up to go to 10x magnification when in manual focus for critical focusing or go to the irritating "beep" to confirm focus. I use mine with my 50-200 f2.8 with no problems.
Kerrisdale had the Olympus reps pre production EM-1 at our photo seminar on the weekend and it's electronic viewfinder is a lot better than the EM-5; apparently it compares with the Canon 1DX full frame SLR.
Barry
__________________
Photography website: https://bjustice.zenfolio.com
2012 Escape "Classic" 5.0 SA / 2017 F150, 2.7 EcoBoost 4X4 Supercab
Former trailers: 2005 Escape 17B / 1972 Boler 13'
|
|
|
11-07-2013, 12:00 AM
|
#38
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia
Trailer: 2009 Escape 17B 2020 Toyota Highlander XLE
Posts: 17,136
|
I've been trying to shoot a hummingbird on approach to the feeder. I don't want the feeder in the shot. So, with the 300mm and manual focus, I have no alternative but to pre-focus on a spot and hope the bird flies into the zone. So far, I have a lot of near misses.
Those hummers move fast.
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
|
|
|
11-07-2013, 01:59 AM
|
#39
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia
Trailer: 2009 Escape 17B 2020 Toyota Highlander XLE
Posts: 17,136
|
Something like this, but a hummer.
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
|
|
|
11-07-2013, 08:49 AM
|
#40
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Barry and I are essentially saying the same thing: mirrorless is not SLR, and in a mirrorless camera an electronic view replaces the SLR's optical view.
The question is whether or not that is good enough for you. The display on the back of the camera typically has better resolution than the "peephole" electronic viewfinder (EVF), so it may work better for fine focus... especially if the camera has a depth-of-field preview (common in SLRs, but I don't know about mirrorless compact systems or the superzoom non-interchangeable lens cameras).
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|