|
|
07-10-2016, 09:43 PM
|
#41
|
Site Team
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Trailer: 2014 Escape 5.0 TA
Posts: 11,023
|
ROFL. I put an extended stinger on my 2000 (bought new ) Ford F-150 and it stayed there for a dozen years. Never got a ticket and love the fact when I couldn't get the Scamp to unhook from the stinger I could stomp on the sucker and it would let go of the ball.
Never mind the time, I was at a red light at the bottom of a hill and the "low rider, rice rocket" rammed into the back of me... that stinger punched a hole through his radiator... no damage to my truck! hahahahahahahaha
__________________
Donna D.
Ten Forward
2014 Escape 5.0TA
|
|
|
07-10-2016, 09:51 PM
|
#42
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by float5
Yes, I thought about keeping it on which I did once but quickly realized that I like to back into parking spaces and that thing can really do damage if you hit someone's vehicle with it. We always take it off.
|
Good idea.
Some moron parked in the space end-to-end with mine at one point, and put the entire WD hitch head in my space. Since it couldn't be seen in my mirrors when I backed in, that could have been destructive. I was completely prepared to pull it out and drop it (from any convenient height) into his box, but it was locked in place.
|
|
|
07-10-2016, 10:02 PM
|
#43
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by float5
Lots of vehicles have blocked plates with all kinds of things.
Often on their ball mount.
|
True. That doesn't make it right, or even legal, although "accidentally" blocking part of the plate with a ball or even a bumper protection shield isn't nearly as bad as deliberately obscuring it with one of the anti-photo-radar devices.
If people can't hook up their trailers with something like this and their plates are obscured by it, they should just remove it when not towing. Incompetence has its price
|
|
|
07-10-2016, 10:10 PM
|
#44
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by float5
It seems that about all states require towing mirrors for towing or at least a lot of them.
|
I doubt that any jurisdiction (state, province, country...) actually requires towing mirrors. What they require is a certain range of vision; if your stock mirrors don't provide that, then you need to replace them with a different design, or add something on.
One consequence is interesting: if one vehicle has add-on mirrors for towing, and another otherwise identical vehicle has built-in mirrors of the same overall width, then only one of them would be required to change anything when not towing. Maybe not fair, but most built-in "towing" mirrors are retractable now.
|
|
|
07-10-2016, 10:28 PM
|
#45
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Denison, Texas
Trailer: 2015 21'; 2011 19' sold; 4Runner; ph ninezero3 327-27ninefour
Posts: 5,136
|
Yes, they do require side mirrors. If your rear view mirror is not sufficient for say, 200' behind, you are required to get side mirrors. Not sure why you are saying that they do not require towing mirrors. They do not simply say that you have to see 200' behind but how to do that --- by requiring side mirrors. Maybe you mean that they do not call them "towing" mirrors? --- guess that is what you mean.
If standard mirrors can show the 200', then it is only "unfair" to the person who has to go buy additional mirrors! He probably thinks it is unfair. But not really.
Of course, there may be those who believe that their mirrors are sufficient when they are not and they simply do not bother or pay for additional ones. And they never realize what the difference would be. There are a few people who tow trailers who do not even think to get other mirrors.
__________________
Cathy. Floating Cloud
"Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air.... "
Emerson
|
|
|
07-10-2016, 10:53 PM
|
#46
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by float5
Yes, they do require side mirrors.
|
Yes, all vehicles require at least one outside mirror (towing or not) and two mirrors are required so if you can't see with an inside mirror (you have a non-window van, or or towing a trailer) that means two outside mirrors. Essentially everything has two outside mirrors now, anyway... it's not like it was when I bought my first car and only the fancy version had a right-side outside mirror.
Quote:
Originally Posted by float5
If your rear view mirror is not sufficient for say, 200' behind, you are required to get side mirrors. Not sure why you are saying that they do not require towing mirrors. They do not simply say that you have to see 200' behind but how to do that --- by requiring side mirrors. Maybe you mean that they do not call them "towing" mirrors? --- guess that is what you mean.
|
They don't need to be especially for towing, whatever they are called. Any outside mirrors - including the ones that come stock on the vehicle - are fine if they provide the specified view.
My Sienna is so wide - as wide as a full-sized pickup truck - that with rented cargo trailers (boxes up to six feet wide) and narrower travel trailers the ordinary stock mirrors are adequate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by float5
If standard mirrors can show the 200', then it is only "unfair" to the person who has to go buy additional mirrors! He probably thinks it is unfair. But not really.
|
Apparently I wasn't clear; this has nothing to do with who might need to buy mirrors.
Two drivers have mirrors which are the same width overall. Both can see equally well around their trailers. They both unhitch their trailers. The one with removable accessory "towing" mirrors must remove them (according to the rule mentioned), while the one with permanently mounted big mirrors doesn't have to do anything, even though they're just as likely to hit something (presumably the reason that removable mirrors must be removed when not towing). Not really fair, but not a big deal unless the towing mirrors are pain to mount and remove... which some are.
And having to remove stuff was how this whole sidetrack started.
|
|
|
07-10-2016, 10:54 PM
|
#47
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SLO County, California
Trailer: 2014 Escape 21C 2019 Expedition
Posts: 5,210
|
Right, 200 feet is what CA requires. Interestingly I've found that the Milenco mirror extensions we bought for our Highlander/17B combo aren't needed with the 21/Yukon combo and I don't miss the vibrating image and having to tighten down the screws periodically or removing them when not towing.
__________________
"We gotta get as far away as we can!"
- Russell Casse, Independence Day
|
|
|
07-10-2016, 11:13 PM
|
#48
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Denison, Texas
Trailer: 2015 21'; 2011 19' sold; 4Runner; ph ninezero3 327-27ninefour
Posts: 5,136
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian B-P
Apparently I wasn't clear; this has nothing to do with who might need to buy mirrors.
Two drivers have mirrors which are the same width overall. Both can see equally well around their trailers. They both unhitch their trailers. The one with removable accessory "towing" mirrors must remove them (according to the rule mentioned), while the one with permanently mounted big mirrors doesn't have to do anything, even though they're just as likely to hit something (presumably the reason that removable mirrors must be removed when not towing). Not really fair, but not a big deal unless the towing mirrors are pain to mount and remove... which some are.
|
I see what you mean on this. I am not familiar with most of the large stock mirrors and just supposed that, if they equal our mirrors plus add-on mirrors, that they would be retractable. And they would simply be required in a few cases to retract them. But I guess there are just some really big mirrors out there that are not retractable.
I was not clear obviously on the requirement for side mirrors. I meant, when you cannot see 200', it is required to have side mirrors in addition to the standard ones. Thus, (additional) side mirrors are specifically mentioned as required by law.
__________________
Cathy. Floating Cloud
"Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air.... "
Emerson
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 04:06 AM
|
#49
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Olympia wa, Washington
Trailer: 5.0TA 2017
Posts: 2,255
|
I don't mind leaving my stinger on I have a back up camera and can see it very well when parking but I am concerned that it will rust in place so probably i should remove it
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 06:01 AM
|
#50
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central, Pennsylvania
Trailer: Escape#5 2022 E19
Posts: 26,268
|
I have always been afraid of those on bikes that like to split the lanes (which is illegal in most areas) and they hit those extended mirrors lots of us may be using....
__________________
Jim
Sometime life gets in the way of living.......
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 07:08 AM
|
#51
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Burlington Twp., New Jersey
Trailer: 2010 Escape 19
Posts: 7,126
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna D.
...I was at a red light at the bottom of a hill and the "low rider, rice rocket" rammed into the back of me... that stinger punched a hole through his radiator... no damage to my truck! hahahahahahahaha
|
Same thing happened to me with no damage to my vehicle. I warned her, but she drove off with her radiator leaking heavily. Since that incident I now leave my ball mount on my vehicle. It's only a short fixed mount. If you hit it you were way closer than you should have been anyway. If you've never driven in NJ consider yourself lucky.
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 07:19 AM
|
#52
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Trailer: 2017 Escape 5.0 TA
Posts: 15,532
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon327
If you've never driven in NJ consider yourself lucky.
|
I did a lot of driving there a couple weeks ago. Yeah, not for me at all. At times I wondered where people lived and worked, as it seemed to be mostly intertangled roadways.
I gave me a new appreciation of our traffic issues here in Calgary. LOL
__________________
2017 Escape 5.0 TA
2015 Ford F150 Lariat 3.5L EcoBoost
2009 Escape 19 (previous)
“Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.” — Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 07:26 AM
|
#53
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southwick, Massachusetts
Trailer: None, sold my 2014 5.0TA
Posts: 7,124
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon327
Same thing happened to me with no damage to my vehicle. I warned her, but she drove off with her radiator leaking heavily. Since that incident I now leave my ball mount on my vehicle. It's only a short fixed mount. If you hit it you were way closer than you should have been anyway. If you've never driven in NJ consider yourself lucky.
|
Here's one, the SuperBumper. Looks like a dandy step too.
__________________
Happy Motoring
Bob
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 12:01 PM
|
#54
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpaharley2008
I have always been afraid of those on bikes that like to split the lanes (which is illegal in most areas) and they hit those extended mirrors lots of us may be using....
|
Firmly in the "not my problem" category.
... although there would be the annoying reporting and paperwork, and damage to the mirror.
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 12:06 PM
|
#55
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon327
... If you hit it you were way closer than you should have been anyway.
|
While the driver in the rear is usually at fault for following too closely or driving without due care and attention, they can also be an innocent victim, rammed by the vehicle behind them - this can happen when you and the person behind you are already stopped. The battering ram in your hitch increases damage to the front of their vehicle while transmitting higher shock to you in your vehicle in front.
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 02:15 PM
|
#56
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Alcoa, Tennessee
Trailer: 2015 5.0 TA
Posts: 419
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian B-P
The battering ram in your hitch increases damage to the front of their vehicle while transmitting higher shock to you in your vehicle in front.
|
I have one of those super bumpers. It has rubber shock absorbers inside the hitch bar that are supposed to minimize damage to my vehicle. Haven't had to test it yet, thank you.
Dick
__________________
2015 Escape 5 TA
2016 Ford F-150
|
|
|
07-11-2016, 09:09 PM
|
#57
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Westcliffe, Colorado
Trailer: 2010 EggCamper (#083); 2017 Escape 21 (#053); 2016 F-150 5.0L FX4
Posts: 1,765
|
We were part of a Jeep Grand Cherokee sandwich once during rush hour traffic (not towing). The JGC in front of us slammed on it's brakes. We got stopped - just barely in time, but the JGC behind us didn't. The biggest damage of the whole thing was what the rear bumper and hitch of the JGC in front did to our grill and radiator. Our hitch pretty much saved our rear bumper. JGC behind us had to pay for damages to us and the JGC in front of us. We still cringe every time we have to drive that same stretch of road in rush hour traffic, which thankfully, is rare.
|
|
|
07-12-2016, 01:25 AM
|
#58
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Portland, Oregon
Trailer: 2015 17B "Tody"
Posts: 129
|
Just to let you know, Jim, I figured that out with my knee cap.
__________________
#!/usr/bin/"Echo"
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|