diesel - Page 12 - Escape Trailer Owners Community

Go Back   Escape Trailer Owners Community > Escape Me | General Topics > General Escape
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 09-01-2014, 01:37 AM   #111
Senior Member
 
Seef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Leeuwarden, The Netherlands, Alabama
Trailer: 2014 Escape 5.0 Classic
Posts: 263
Hi guys,

to add some more fuel to the discussion......

Last friday we picked up our new TV, the 2014 ISUZU 2.5L (4 cyl) Diesel Twin Turbo, about 160 HP

We took it out for a ride this weekend and found it burns diesel at about 9-10 KM's per liter, that is about 36-40 Miles per Gallon at 120KmH or 74MpH which is the standard max speed in our country. The truck has about 400Nm of torque.

We did do some towing but did not pay any attention to the fuel consumption then, too busy paying attention to the road, rig etc, you know, sweaty hands and so.

When we hit the road for vacation i will pay attention to that detail and keep you posted.

I'm quite happy, since diesel is cheaper then gasoline over here i'm very happy.

Have fun!

Severinus and Yvonne
__________________

__________________
Escape 5.0 classic (ARRIVED in Holland)
TV - ISUZU D-Max
Favorite destination (Europe) - Tuscany
Seef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 02:12 AM   #112
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 9,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seef View Post
Last friday we picked up our new TV, the 2014 ISUZU 2.5L (4 cyl) Diesel Twin Turbo, about 160 HP
... it burns diesel at about 9-10 KM's per liter, that is about 36-40 Miles per Gallon at 120KmH or 74MpH ...
In the units used in Canada, this is 10 to 11 L/100 km (at 120 km/h). I think it's interesting that this is a about the same as our Toyota Sienna van (with a 3.3 L gas engine, 230 hp).
__________________

Brian B-P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 04:02 AM   #113
Senior Member
 
rbryan4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Trailer: 2015 19 "Past Tents", 2015 F150 Ecoboost
Posts: 7,570
Seef, if diesel were cheaper here than gasoline, a diesel vehicle would be much more attractive, even with the higher up front cost. Here in south Texas, diesel is currently about 50¢ higher per gallon than gasoline, and I've seen it as much as a dollar higher in some places. I have yet to hear a satisfactory reason why.
__________________
"You can't buy happiness, but you can buy an RV. And that is pretty close."
rbryan4 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 04:03 AM   #114
Senior Member
 
rbryan4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Trailer: 2015 19 "Past Tents", 2015 F150 Ecoboost
Posts: 7,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian B-P View Post
I assume that this is intended to mean the fuel price per volume; the total fuel cost should be less with diesel, but not as much less as it would be if the price per volume were the same. The article mentions 6 pence per litre; that's about 38 cents (US) per US gallon, or 11 cents (Can) per litre... so yes, the analysis seems applicable here in that respect. On the other hand, even if the two fuels were identically priced, there would still be a break-even point, and the higher the fuel price the quicker the payback. With relatively cheaper fuel here, payback will take even longer.

The article says that the break-even point is 10,000 miles per year. I think that the average use in North America is comfortably higher than that - 12,000 miles or 20,000 kilometres per year are typical assumptions. On the other hand, if we're talking about a vehicle used primarily as a trailer tug, use might be lower.

If anyone is trying to put the British models in perspective, the Fiesta is the same car sold here (but the examples use smaller engines), the Sharan is not sold in North America (it's a tall wagon, vaguely like a Dodge Journey), the BMW 5-series is again the same car sold here with different engine options, and the Astra is the current version of the car of the same name sold here by Saturn until a few years ago.
Correct, I meant price per unit (gallon in my case). And yes, I would tend to agree that the British numbers are better than what we could expect in the US, with diesel fuel being so much higher than gas, and the even higher premium charged for diesel vehicles.
__________________
"You can't buy happiness, but you can buy an RV. And that is pretty close."
rbryan4 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 08:13 AM   #115
Senior Member
 
Cypherian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dover, Delaware
Trailer: Escape 19' 2012 Tacoma 4x4 V6 DBLCB 2011
Posts: 582
Hey,

Something to consider on the newer diesels as far as cost is the urea-based system injection systems that stuff is pricey.

CYpher
__________________
Veritas Lux Mea
Cypherian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 08:20 AM   #116
Site Team
 
cpaharley2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: York, Pennsylvania
Trailer: 2016 2ndGen Escape 19' PRAIRIE SCHOONER pulled by 2014 Ram Hemi/8sp
Posts: 13,655
Yes, it is what I throw away every day from my cat litter box!! I just read the diesel supplement manual to the Ram Eco Diesel, there are several additional items one has to be aware of, water in the fuel and special filter, plug in heat for winter cold, having to let the unit run before shutting down, particularly after towing, up to 5 minutes to cool down the the turbo, and the oil changes and so on. I'm now thinking the ecoboost maybe a better option, particularly for 2015 when ford is using aluminum to shave off 700 pounds. The smaller 2.7 is projected to reach 30 mpg unhitched.
__________________
Jim
The two most important days in your life are the day you were born and the day you find out why………..Mark Twain
cpaharley2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 11:04 AM   #117
Senior Member
 
Cypherian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dover, Delaware
Trailer: Escape 19' 2012 Tacoma 4x4 V6 DBLCB 2011
Posts: 582
Yeah Jim most of those other items you mention eexcept the fuel filter will still let the vehicle run correctly. As I understand it if you run out of the urea the vehicle will go into limp home mode max speed of 30 mph vehicle dependent of course.

Cypher
Cypherian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 11:07 AM   #118
Senior Member
 
rbryan4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Trailer: 2015 19 "Past Tents", 2015 F150 Ecoboost
Posts: 7,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpaharley2008 View Post
Yes, it is what I throw away every day from my cat litter box!! I just read the diesel supplement manual to the Ram Eco Diesel, there are several additional items one has to be aware of, water in the fuel and special filter, plug in heat for winter cold, having to let the unit run before shutting down, particularly after towing, up to 5 minutes to cool down the the turbo, and the oil changes and so on. I'm now thinking the ecoboost maybe a better option, particularly for 2015 when ford is using aluminum to shave off 700 pounds. The smaller 2.7 is projected to reach 30 mpg unhitched.
Yeah, if the Ecoboost approaches anywhere near the mileage of the diesel, then I think the gas engine is the better choice. If we were towing a 5000lb+ trailer then no.
__________________
"You can't buy happiness, but you can buy an RV. And that is pretty close."
rbryan4 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 01:00 PM   #119
Senior Member
 
dave macrae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: St.Albert, Alberta
Trailer: 21 ft November 17th
Posts: 844
It's a tough one to answer . Our trailers don't need the torque that the bigger trailers do. That's IMHO one of the nice things about these trailers, you don't have to drive a 1 ton dual rear wheeled truck to work everyday just to tow your trailer in the summer.
I know that here in Alberta a synthetic oil change and fuel filter at the dealer will run close to $300.00 . That does buy a lot of gas. Especially if the mileage is
Close.
__________________
MacRae, 21ft
2016 GMC Yukon SLT
St.Albert Alberta
dave macrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2014, 01:41 PM   #120
Senior Member
 
DeadEyeDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Sacramento, California
Trailer: 2017 Bigfoot 25
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbryan4 View Post
Yeah, if the Ecoboost approaches anywhere near the mileage of the diesel, then I think the gas engine is the better choice. If we were towing a 5000lb+ trailer then no.
My friend pulls a 24' Lance with his and he says it does fine. Not sure how heavy it is, but it has to be up in the 4000-5000 LB range.

Reace says he tows his Toy Hauler with his and he says it hangs with the diesels.

Supposedly, with the right tow package, the Ecoboost F150 can tow 11,300. Mine is only rated at 8500.

Personally, if I had a 8,000-10,000 lb trailer, I think I'd go Super Duty and diesel.
__________________

__________________
DeadEye Dan
2017 Bigfoot 25 Rear Bed
2012 Ford F150 Ecoboost
DeadEyeDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off






» Virginia Campgrounds

Reviews provided by



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.