|
|
12-18-2014, 10:08 PM
|
#121
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Van., British Columbia
Trailer: 2014 Escape 19, sold; 2019 Escape 21, Sept. 2019
Posts: 8,793
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Bennett
Maybe I need to learn more on these multibank battery chargers, and how they work, as it sure seems like they are dealing with either separate batteries, or or ones in parallel.
|
Gotta agree, to me, two 6 volt batteries permanently connected in series isn't a multibank situation.
Ron
|
|
|
12-19-2014, 12:40 PM
|
#122
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central, Pennsylvania
Trailer: Escape#5 2022 E19
Posts: 26,268
|
Back to my original post. today I received my Zamp Solar Battery Check kit. See here for details for the Battery Check info http://www.zampsolar.com/solar-acces...ry-management/
I'll be posting the dual battery and Battery Check install right after the holidays. I need to find some old battery cores to turn in between now and then. If anyone else is interested in the Battery Check, Zamp Solar- is offering their kit which sell for $299 retail a special $265 price for forum members, both here and over FGRV. If interested, please p/m me and I'll provide the person to call. Happy Holidays until then.
__________________
Jim
Sometime life gets in the way of living.......
|
|
|
12-19-2014, 01:49 PM
|
#123
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thoer
|
Yes, that's informative. I have a similar socket-mounted voltmeter, and have used it to understand how the charging system is behaving in a couple of cars. These devices have green/yellow/red lights to indicate "battery charge status", but it's just another indication of the same voltage, compared to some set levels.
Just one note: you are measuring voltage at an accessory socket, which will be very close to battery voltage. Your trailer is getting something lower, depending on how much resistance is in the wiring from your tug battery to trailer, and the current flowing in that circuit.
|
|
|
12-19-2014, 02:15 PM
|
#124
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thoer
Latest reply from NOCO about their charger:
You can use the G7200 to charge the two 6V batteries its just not ideal. Even though they are the same size, condition and age, when your batteries are in use one battery is going to discharge faster than the other...
|
It still looks to me like they're describing a parallel set of banks instead of a series set of cells in one bank; however, I have seen wiring recommendations from a charger manufacturer which shows separate charging of batteries in series.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thoer
I don't see why one would discharge faster than the other as they contend, when they are wired in series.
|
There is some logic to this, because the current passed through a battery is not exactly the same as the change in state of charge. Each cell has some internal inefficiency, and if the cells of one battery are not in exactly the same condition as those in the other battery, delivering exactly the same current from each battery will cause slightly different changes in the state of charge. The same thing happens, of course, between the cells of one battery, which is why batteries routinely die due to the weakest cell becoming unacceptable, even though the others are still usable.
I think most people - and most battery manufacturers - are okay with charging any number of cells in series with one charger, and just treating the whole series as a set which will need to be replaced together.
|
|
|
12-19-2014, 02:27 PM
|
#125
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thoer
Not sure on your differentiation, other than the amount of time it takes to charge?
|
Yes, I'm thinking mostly of time. If I'm going for a weekend trip and will make the entire trip on stored energy, then have a week (or weeks) to charge before the next trip, then charging speed doesn't matter. If I have an overnight stop with outside power to get the batteries back up, then it does matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thoer
From what I have read, Interstate talks about charging volts not watts, and when I take multimeter readings, this one is reaching the 14.7v it is rated at during the absorption phase.
|
This means that 5 amps is enough to complete the absorption phase. I wouldn't have been certain of that, since the target current for the end of the bulk charge phase (as shown in Trojan Users Guide as an example) is ramping down from 10 to 13% of the C20 capacity (so, 23 to 31 amps for a 232 Ah battery bank) to 1 to 3% (so, 2.3 to 6.9 amps for a 232 Ah battery bank; the 3% or 6.9 amp value preferred) as the voltage is held in at the terminal voltage of that phase (14.1 to 14.7 V).
In other words, the 5 amp charger doesn't really get a chance to go through bulk and absorption states - it does its best, and is current-limited for the whole time until it essentially reaches the state (14.7V and almost 3% of rated capacity per hour flowing) that a faster charger would reach in bulk plus absorption stages. If that is good for the battery, then fine.
|
|
|
12-19-2014, 05:01 PM
|
#126
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Galesville, Wisconsin
Trailer: 2017 21 "Blue II" & 2017 Highlander XLE (previously 2010 17B "Blue" & 2008 Tacoma)
Posts: 4,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian B-P
Just one note: you are measuring voltage at an accessory socket, which will be very close to battery voltage. Your trailer is getting something lower, depending on how much resistance is in the wiring from your tug battery to trailer, and the current flowing in that circuit.
|
I was thinking that too. I suppose the easiest way might be to get a same time reading at the socket and at the battery and calculate the % voltage loss between them.
__________________
Eric (and Mary who is in no way responsible for anything stupid I post)
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
12-19-2014, 05:05 PM
|
#127
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Galesville, Wisconsin
Trailer: 2017 21 "Blue II" & 2017 Highlander XLE (previously 2010 17B "Blue" & 2008 Tacoma)
Posts: 4,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian B-P
Trojan Users Guide as an example) is ramping down from 10 to 13% of the C20 capacity (so, 23 to 31 amps for a 232 Ah battery bank) to 1 to 3% (so, 2.3 to 6.9 amps for a 232 Ah battery bank; the 3% or 6.9 amp value preferred) as the voltage is held in at the terminal voltage of that phase (14.1 to 14.7 V).
In other words, the 5 amp charger doesn't really get a chance to go through bulk and absorption states - it does its best, and is current-limited for the whole time until it essentially reaches the state (14.7V and almost 3% of rated capacity per hour flowing) that a faster charger would reach in bulk plus absorption stages. If that is good for the battery, then fine.
|
The NOCO would not meet those current requirement either, so I might as well just save my money for more homebrew ingredients!
__________________
Eric (and Mary who is in no way responsible for anything stupid I post)
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
12-19-2014, 06:54 PM
|
#128
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Trailer: 1979 Boler B1700
Posts: 14,935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thoer
The NOCO would not meet those current requirement either, so I might as well just save my money for more homebrew ingredients!
|
I agree that the NOCO G7200 is marginal by this measure, which may be why NOCO is reluctant to recommend it. The NOCO G26000 would have suitable boost and absorption stage output; I don't know why they don't recommend it as a maintainer in the application chart, but it is still listed as "usable".
|
|
|
08-15-2015, 12:46 PM
|
#129
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Galesville, Wisconsin
Trailer: 2017 21 "Blue II" & 2017 Highlander XLE (previously 2010 17B "Blue" & 2008 Tacoma)
Posts: 4,233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian B-P
I agree that the NOCO G7200 is marginal by this measure, which may be why NOCO is reluctant to recommend it. The NOCO G26000 would have suitable boost and absorption stage output; I don't know why they don't recommend it as a maintainer in the application chart, but it is still listed as "usable".
|
Now I see NOCO has a 15A model the NOCO Genius G15000 My BatteryTender may have gone bad on me, so now I'm once again thinking of a maintainer for storage use that would do a better job than the built in model. Anybody tried the G1500? I'm considering it vs the BatteryMinder people have recommended.
__________________
Eric (and Mary who is in no way responsible for anything stupid I post)
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|