|
|
04-14-2021, 06:56 PM
|
#21
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Trailer: 2012 Escape 5.0
Posts: 77
|
Common vs. Separate Controllers
Quote:
Originally Posted by marsman
I have a Zamp port installed on my trailer but I think the wires from the Zamp port just hang loose inside the dinette box, if I hook them up to the controller paying attention to get the polarity right, I assume that the rooftop panel and solar panel with then both be charging through the one solar controller; sorry, I'm new to all this solar stuff. if so, maybe I'll get that 100w solar suitcase from Renogy, it does have a good price right now, may come in handy if we go to Quartzite next year.
|
Yes but...
Your parallel connection to the input of the solar charge controller is correct, but if the voltage output (current doesn't matter in parallel) of attached panels differ, they will all be pulled down to the lower value. This can be caused by the panel design (i.e. speced working voltage) or, any part of any one of the panels being shaded.
If the intent is to have a portable panel in a sunny location because the trailer panels are shaded, separate controllers would work better. The output of both controllers are then connected to the battery. The output of the unshaded panel is then likely to be higher than with a single controller.
|
|
|
04-14-2021, 07:36 PM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Trailer: 2014 Escape 15B sold, 2019 Escape 19
Posts: 367
|
Yes, separate controllers are better if the voltage of the roof panel(s) is different from the ground one, if that’s not the case, and you connect the panels in parallel, shading on one will not affect the other, that’s the main advantage of connecting multiple panels in parallel.
|
|
|
04-14-2021, 08:04 PM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Trailer: 2019 5.0 TA
Posts: 349
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnE3
Yes but...
Your parallel connection to the input of the solar charge controller is correct, but if the voltage output (current doesn't matter in parallel) of attached panels differ, they will all be pulled down to the lower value. This can be caused by the panel design (i.e. speced working voltage) or, any part of any one of the panels being shaded.
If the intent is to have a portable panel in a sunny location because the trailer panels are shaded, separate controllers would work better. The output of both controllers are then connected to the battery. The output of the unshaded panel is then likely to be higher than with a single controller.
|
Thx for this info, I did not know that you could wire up two separate controllers to the same batteries. I will probably do this way then. You are correct in that I would mainly use the suitcase panels if the rooftop solar is shaded although I could also use the suitcase solar as a supplement during dimmer days.
|
|
|
04-14-2021, 08:20 PM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia
Trailer: 2009 Escape 17B 2020 Toyota Highlander XLE
Posts: 17,136
|
My two portable solar panels go to a hub, to a controller, to the battery terminals.
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
|
|
|
04-14-2021, 08:26 PM
|
#25
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: C, North Carolina
Trailer: 2020 21' Escape
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnE3
Yes but...
Your parallel connection to the input of the solar charge controller is correct, but if the voltage output (current doesn't matter in parallel) of attached panels differ, they will all be pulled down to the lower value. This can be caused by the panel design (i.e. speced working voltage) or, any part of any one of the panels being shaded.
If the intent is to have a portable panel in a sunny location because the trailer panels are shaded, separate controllers would work better. The output of both controllers are then connected to the battery. The output of the unshaded panel is then likely to be higher than with a single controller.
|
I’m curious how much more charge will you get by having two separate controllers? I ask because I have no idea. Is it like 50% more? 2% more?
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 10:23 AM
|
#26
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Crestview, Florida
Trailer: 2020 25' Flying Cloud Airstream with three 90-watt Zamp Solar roof panels and 140-watt ZS Portable
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marsman
I have a Zamp port installed on my trailer but I think the wires from the Zamp port just hang loose inside the dinette box, if I hook them up to the controller paying attention to get the polarity right, I assume that the rooftop panel and solar panel with then both be charging through the one solar controller; sorry, I'm new to all this solar stuff. if so, maybe I'll get that 100w solar suitcase from Renogy, it does have a good price right now, may come in handy if we go to Quartzite next year.
|
A Zamp Solar Port can be wired in two options. Either directly to the battery (assumes your portable has a charge controller) or it can be wired directly to an indoor charge controller (the need for controller on portable goes away). That’s when you can use an unregulated portable. Having two charge controllers do the same job can cause conflicts. PM me if you want more information.
__________________
Tony Gautney, CCM
Former ETI 2017 21’ Double Axle
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 10:27 AM
|
#27
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Crestview, Florida
Trailer: 2020 25' Flying Cloud Airstream with three 90-watt Zamp Solar roof panels and 140-watt ZS Portable
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMarkH
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone has had experience with this suitcase solar panel. It is on for a good price, in fact the cheapest I have seen for 100w. I have the Zamp port so the version I am looking at has no controller. Also, I know I will need to buy a reverse polarity adapter.
Anyone with experience with this one happy with it? Are there other models or brands I should consider? Looking for only non-controller versions.
Thanks! Mark
|
After all of the modifications needed to work, are you really saving any money with the Renegy option?
__________________
Tony Gautney, CCM
Former ETI 2017 21’ Double Axle
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 10:29 AM
|
#28
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Crestview, Florida
Trailer: 2020 25' Flying Cloud Airstream with three 90-watt Zamp Solar roof panels and 140-watt ZS Portable
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndNeitherDoI
I’m curious how much more charge will you get by having two separate controllers? I ask because I have no idea. Is it like 50% more? 2% more?
|
CONFLICTS
How do you know what controller is running the show? PM if you want more information.
__________________
Tony Gautney, CCM
Former ETI 2017 21’ Double Axle
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 11:17 AM
|
#29
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ, Arizona
Trailer: gone, 19 and 21 & 17B with 5.0 now. gone
Posts: 790
|
renoge 100 watt suitcase panel
who has this on sale now?
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 11:23 AM
|
#30
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Crestview, Florida
Trailer: 2020 25' Flying Cloud Airstream with three 90-watt Zamp Solar roof panels and 140-watt ZS Portable
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnE3
Yes but...
Your parallel connection to the input of the solar charge controller is correct, but if the voltage output (current doesn't matter in parallel) of attached panels differ, they will all be pulled down to the lower value. This can be caused by the panel design (i.e. speced working voltage) or, any part of any one of the panels being shaded.
If the intent is to have a portable panel in a sunny location because the trailer panels are shaded, separate controllers would work better. The output of both controllers are then connected to the battery. The output of the unshaded panel is then likely to be higher than with a single controller.
|
You are inviting conflicts with two charge controllers doing the same function.
__________________
Tony Gautney, CCM
Former ETI 2017 21’ Double Axle
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 12:05 PM
|
#31
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia
Trailer: 2009 Escape 17B 2020 Toyota Highlander XLE
Posts: 17,136
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBA80
You are inviting conflicts with two charge controllers doing the same function.
|
As noted earlier in this thread, I have two panels. They are connected to a hub which is connected to the controller and controller via alligator clips to the battery terminals.
They are branded 'Coleman'.
Similar to this one pictured.
__________________
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
- Bertolt Brecht
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 04:31 PM
|
#32
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Trailer: 2014 Escape 15B sold, 2019 Escape 19
Posts: 367
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBA80
You are inviting conflicts with two charge controllers doing the same function.
|
I disagree, you can have multiple charge controllers charging the same battery bank without a problem when talking about a modest RV solar system. If you are running multiple systems capable of pushing very high currents you may run into issues.
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 06:43 PM
|
#33
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lanesboro, MN, between Whalan and Fountain, Minnesota
Trailer: 2016 Bigfoot 25RQ - (2018 Escape 5.0 sold)
Posts: 2,174
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBA80
You are inviting conflicts with two charge controllers doing the same function.
|
Sorry, but count me in as another who disagrees. I have no problems with two controllers going to our batteries and there are many, many others who also have two controllers going to the same bank.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBA80
CONFLICTS
How do you know what controller is running the show? PM if you want more information.
|
Neither controller has to run the show, nor need to run the show either. They both do their job according to how each controller is setup. The battery could care less.
Enjoy,
Perry
__________________
Those who know everything use pens. Intelligent people use pencils.
|
|
|
04-15-2021, 06:47 PM
|
#34
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Lanesboro, MN, between Whalan and Fountain, Minnesota
Trailer: 2016 Bigfoot 25RQ - (2018 Escape 5.0 sold)
Posts: 2,174
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vermilye
You may or may not need a polarity reverser, depending on how Escape wires them. My suggestion would be to check the polarity of both the solar controller output and the trailer connector. If both are the same, good. If not, I'd reverse the internal connections in the trailer. This is a better long term solution than remembering to add a reversing adapter.
|
I didn't want to have to remember to include the reversers. That's why I put red tape on the black wire and black tape on the red wire, IOW's I reversed the internal connections.
Enjoy,
Perry
__________________
Those who know everything use pens. Intelligent people use pencils.
|
|
|
04-16-2021, 12:21 AM
|
#35
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Richmond, British Columbia
Trailer: 2023 Escape 21 NE, past: Escape 19 (2021)
Posts: 37
|
For those wondering where to get the Renogy solar panel, Amazon.ca has it for a great price. Likely available on the US .com site as well.
Summarizing what I have hearing on this threat I don’t see an issue with two controllers as long as each is wired separately to the battery. The Renogy seems like a decent unit.
__________________
_______________
Mark and Lisa Heywood
Escape 21 NE (2023), Previous Escape 19 (2021)
Richmond, BC Canada
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|