|
10-01-2024, 04:54 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Trailer: 2023 E19
Posts: 382
|
Bumper Pull with Front Overhang Layout
I recently watched this video about a "retro" cabover prototype trailer layout to be introduced by Riverside RV. The design features a shortened 5th wheel-style bunk that overhangs the A-frame of a bumper-pull trailer.
Having never come across a vintage trailer with this layout, I admit it looks a little weird to me. I suspect that the tongue weight is a little on the high side. However, the interior space looks impressive for its size. It offers the space efficiency similar to a 5th wheel, but allows full access to/use of the TV's cargo bed.
Would this layout interest you if it was offered by one of the molded FG manufacturers?
|
|
|
10-02-2024, 05:12 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tampa Bay Area, Florida
Trailer: 2015 Escape 5.0TA (Little Elsie) Extensively Personalized
Posts: 3,053
|
In the late 1950s/early 1960s Nomad and I believed Shasta built travel trailers in this format. My parents had a Nomad. I was consigned to the “overhead bunk.” It was a bit cramped vertically, and I remember my eyes stinging as well as the added heat which rises when they ran the wall mounted propane lantern common in trailers of that vintage. I saw one of them a couple of years ago that had been restored. But to answer your question, I personally would not be interested in this configuration in fiberglass. I believe (my opinion) the Escape 5.0 fifth wheel and the Scamp 19 commonly referred to as a fifth wheel but by definition is not (definition refers to how the trailer hitches to the tow vehicle) are more preferable “overhang” options. It should also be noted that many Escape 5.0 owners have technically changed their fifth wheel capable trailers by using an Anderson hitch (coupler and ball) to the non-fifth wheel configuration used by Scamp.
__________________
What a long strange trip it’s been!
|
|
|
10-02-2024, 08:46 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Ridgway, Colorado
Trailer: 2018,5.0 TA
Posts: 437
|
It looks like it would only work with a lower profile tow vehicle otherwise the front overhang would interfere with the tow vehicle while cornering. So even though it doesn't take up pickup bed space like the 5.0 hitch I think it would prevent you from having a topper on a pickup, or towing with a tall transit van.
|
|
|
10-02-2024, 09:42 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: East of Austin, Texas
Trailer: 2021 Escape 5.0 / 2022 F150 SuperCab
Posts: 3,240
|
Interesting, but is the market niche too small?
Clearly the overhang renders it suitable only for open-bed pickups or maybe cars with a true low trunk (the latter waning in popularity these days).
Given the weight and tongue weight mentioned in the video I suppose there could be a market among the many owners of small pickups, those not suited for the 5.0 or Scamp. Methinks it's not imagined as an alternative to any trailer using an in-bed hitch, but rather as an alternative to other bumper-pulls.
The floorplan does offer some distinct features rarely found in size-comparable bumper-pulls which some folks might find attractive (e.g. sleeping without converting the dinette; the dry-bath (if I dare say that hoping to not trigger another wet-bath thread highjack).
An interesting revival of an old concept that never was very common and faded away .... perhaps that history is an indication that the market niche is too small to justify production, regardless of the construction.
Personally, I don't think that the construction, even if FG (which would likely raise the price-point due to mold-cost amortization), would have a significant influence on the number of such units sold - methinks it's the price, floorplan, and clearance requirements that would dominate consumer consideration of the design in this case.
|
|
|
10-02-2024, 10:26 AM
|
#5
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Celina, Texas
Trailer: Sold my Airstream, Just ordered an Escape E23 F1
Posts: 28
|
Did I miss seeing a sink in the bath area?
|
|
|
10-02-2024, 11:21 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Van., British Columbia
Trailer: 2014 Escape 19, sold; 2019 Escape 21, Sept. 2019
Posts: 9,341
|
[QUOTE=Centex;477458
some folks might find attractive (e.g. sleeping without converting the dinette; the dry-bath
[/QUOTE]
Given the choice between having to put the table down or having to climb up to a cramped high bed, I'd take the table.
One thing that I'd never go for is having a trailer that I couldn't look out from on all 4 sides. Without windows on either the front or rear I'd find it claustrophobic. We spend a lot of time in our trailer and like to see what's going on all around us. Even if I was to buy a 23 I'd eliminate the upper cabinet between the twin beds and install a window there.
But these retro situations are interesting. On the other hand there's a reason why the mainstream has evolved away from some of those designs.
Ron
|
|
|
10-02-2024, 06:28 PM
|
#7
|
Site Team
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Framingham, Massachusetts
Trailer: 2019 Escape 21C, NTU April 2022
Posts: 1,143
|
Don't see how you can get up to the bed. Remove the table and attach a ladder?
Wouldn't work with our Ford Expedition, I think.
|
|
|
10-02-2024, 09:34 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Overbrook, Kansas
Trailer: 2021 E19 (Padawan)
Posts: 2,240
|
Our 1970 Nomad 19 had a bunk over the bed in front. It had a small ladder that then hooked on the edge to make a guard rail. The bunk worked fine when we were kids until the heat or oven got cranked up, and then it got really hot up there.
__________________
Randy & Barb
1998 C 2500 (Cruncher) and 2021 Ranger (Yoda)
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Discussions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|