Perry Butler
Senior Member
If they hadn't been called mockups at one time I wouldn't have used the term. Besides mockup/prototypes, who cares, the point is a simple mockup/prototype should have been utilized to avoid the pitfall of the expensive fiberglass molds they encountered. They had a couple of other good layouts that would have worked at 23' though.Worked in engineering for 30 years FWIW … but the standard practice everywhere, from instrumentation, to automotive, aerospace and RV’s is to CAD it out, then build out several prototypes - just as Escape is doing. Nobody has ‘ergonomic experts’, I’ve never seen such a job or person purporting skills, but what we all do is pass those protos around (or walk in/around them) until you get a feeling for where you want this to go, based on costing, build, end user experience and so on. But mockups are necessary, I have a full professional VR rig and can build you a trailer in 3D using Blender you can walk around virtually, and I guarantee you’d still find a million issues if you tried to slam that into production without protos (they’re not called mockups). Three is the typical amount.
Ergonomics has been used in the automotive and air industries for decades. And yes, there are experts that are paid dearly, even in todays CAD evironment. Terry's son is an engineer team leader in the agricultural industry, mainly with operator cabs, and we've had numerous discussions about ergonomics.
We've had a number of 24-25' campers and I thought 23' might not work when I first heard they were going to have a front bed/rear dinette. Plus, I've been in a number of 25' Airstreams and now have had two 25' Bigfoots with the front bed/rear dinette setup and subtracting two feet with a dry bath would create a cramped camper. Our friends have a 23' Airstream FB with dry bath and it's cramped, but front bed/rear bath, not front bed rear dinette. Escape could have chosen that layout and it would have worked, but not front bed/rear dinette.
Enjoy,
Perry
Last edited: