RangerMan
Senior Member
Boondocking and taking the world with you. A puzzlement!
Where I live, I pay $40 a month for what is .4 up and about 2.5 down, but that’s only when it works which is about 75% of the time. I could pay $80 a month and have .4 up and about 5 down, but it would still only work about 3/4 of the time. The other options are Viasat or Hughesnet. Neither of those are worthwhile to me given their limitations. So while I don’t want to pay $99 a month, it’s far easier to get stuff done and it’s the only viable option here. Fiber is a mile away, but the provider has not done anything with it in two years. It’s just sitting in the ground doing nothing.
Have you checked different cell carriers recently?
I know T-Mobile has been building out their 600 and 700 mhz bands. These lower frequency bands have better longer range coverage.
We use our cellphone hotspots exclusively for our internet about 6 months of the year. Our house has cable internet mostly to be able to stream security cameras.
Boondocking and taking the world with you. A puzzlement!
With 600 and 700 MHz bands, not to mention the Sprint merger, T-Mobile should be much better. Except that it is not in the real life. At least that’s our experience with it.
I am not particularly keen to switch away to Verizon (as we like the international usage options much better) but thinking of alternatives like adding a Verizon MIFI to supplement T-Mobile phones. But, as it is, the FordLink requires what amounts to an AT&T data subscription. So, these things are getting out out hand.
If Starlink were to get real for RV usage, we could get rid of some of that complexity and cost.
There is fixed cell internet like GoogleFi close, but not at my house. It cost more than StarLink here. As far as hotspots, it’s not any faster here, and has data caps and / or throttling. I’ve tried to switch to anything other than what I have. I have it because it’s the best of a very bad choice. If it’s not truly unlimited, it’s not helpful for me. Caps and throttling don’t work for my needs. We travel for 2-3 months at a time, and I don’t work then. So tethering my phone is fine for that. At home, where I work, I need more.
Boondocking and taking the world with you. A puzzlement!
Boondocking and taking the world with you. A puzzlement!
If there is a way to segregate your 'junk traffic' like video and music streaming from you business traffic, you might try having two lines and doing that. T-Mobile's standard data is fast enough for casual web browsing, as well as music and video streaming (at 480P). For tasks that require true high speed internet they offer 20 GB of highspeed data for $20. The problem is steaming video and the like suck right through that 20 GB and that's not why I got it. The solution was to set up two hotspots, one on my wife's phone for the all the 'junk traffic', and a second one on my phone that is only used when true highspeed internet is needed. I don't know if that helps you, but, it does work for us.
I agree. Some folks live on the road, but if I did that, I would only boondock for a “vacation.” When I’m traveling, If I have cell fine; if not fine. I’ll be someplace in a week or two that has it.
At home I work, and really need better internet; some folks just work on the road. I travel in my job, but then I go back home. Others travel with their home. That, to me, is the difference.
I have no idea why some want so much electricity for boondocking. Two 6v batteries and no solar or generator, and 6 days in the summer is fine. Only a day or two when below freezing because of the furnace draw on batteries. I figure a solar panel or two, and I’ll be good until the tanks are an issue, and even until the propane runs out. Propane use also depends on the weather. the Fresh water and dumping are always the first limitations I reach, and that takes several days. If you plan ahead, you can deal with that.
I just remember all of the years we spent traveling in the 60’s-80’s with one group 24 12v battery in the trailer hanging out in national forests for weeks at a time in the summer. Electricity was never an issue.
We all know, each of us has different wants and priorities.
But the only way I can get better internet at home right now is StarLink.
Last September we picked up our Escape in Sumas. While I do have a WeBoost in my Sprinter, we streamed music using T-Mobile on US 2 constantly from Washington to the Michigan UP with only about a total of 15 minutes of dead spots on the entire trip.
In 2018 we did a 2 month trip through the Michigan UP to Yellowstone and purchased a StraightTalk phone on the Verizon network to supplement our T-Mobile phones.
In 2019 we did a similar 2 month trip to Yosemite also starting up through the Michigan UP. Again we activated the StraightTalk Verizon network phone. After the first month we didn't renew it as we had as good or better coverage on our T-Mobile phones. This was especially true on Native American lands, not sure why.
Verizon and AT&T have actually filed official complaints with the FCC that T-Mobile has a competitive advantage over them due to T-Mobile having better 600 mhz coverage.
T-Mobile amassed “unprecedented concentration of spectrum,”
All this is mostly state highways and largely off the interstate. It reflects our pattern of travel. That's why the high interest in Starlink, cell phone providers, signal boosters, and so on.
The veering off of posts like these responses is the most frustrating and unhelpful part of this forum.
For the current Starlink system that is available to select customers in select areas, the power consumption is about 100 watts according to a variety of reports, including this one: https://camperreport.com/starlink-i..., the Starlink dish,just to run your internet.
- Bea