Red herrings and false comparisons aren't an adequate response to scientific debate. Just saying. To suggest that every scientific debate is settled and those who look honestly at the contradictory information are "deniers" and "conspiracy theorists" is quite shallow. There's a vast difference between those who approach science with an open and honest mind, looking at all sides of the debate, and those who cling to every conspiracy that comes down the pike.
__________________
"You can't buy happiness, but you can buy an RV. And that is pretty close."
|